In the video above, Matthew Haverly is interviewed about the “body” found behind his house. Haverly talks to reporters as if he doesn’t know what is going on.
It later turns out that the body found was that of his mother!
Haverly gives all kind of clues that he isn’t being honest.
What do you see when you watch Haverly?
Be prepared to be chilled.
I will share my thoughts in the comments below in the coming days.
This is really hard to listen to if you put yourself in the patient’s shoes who woke up after a colonoscopy and realized he had recorded the whole procedure. He didn’t mean to do so, but he did it by accident. And what he hears is shocking.
Dr. Tiffany M. Ingham is as unprofessional, cold and callous as they come and worst of all, she came up with a fake diagnosis to give the man even more hell he didn’t deserve when she said, “I’m going to mark ‘hemorrhoids’ even though we don’t see them and probably won’t.” Then she put the diagnosis in the man’s chart! She flat out lied!
The victim was awarded $500,000 in a lawsuit, however, no discipline actions have been taken against Dr. Ingham, which I find really disheartening. This is a woman who gave the oath to do no harm, and she clearly violated that. She shows no respect for this patient whatsoever.
Sadly, most patients don’t know who they will get as an anesthesiologist when going under for a medical procedure or surgery. They typically don’t tell you who it will be, and you rarely see them. Or if you do, it’s only at the very last minute when you can do nothing about it!
If you live in Florida, news reports say she is now living down by you and working there now. If you have to go under, I would certainly recommend that ask who your anesthesiologist is ahead of time so you can avoid this one. She clearly has serious issues that I don’t think will be resolved even by the exposure of this incident.
When I look at these two pilots, their faces automatically communicate information to me. Science has been studying this and call it “personality identification at zero acquaintance.” I call it facial profiling.
When I look at Capt Zaharie Ahmad Shah, the second man in the grouping above, I see very warm features in his face. His nose, lips and cheeks support a very kind and compassionate person. I believe the captain was very well liked by people. He had a soft, gentle nature about him in his daily life. He was likely superb around children, too. He was a caring individual. People trusted him without question. He was always respectful of others as well.
I also see a very intelligent man–one who had above average intelligence. He likely was known as someone who was very smart. And yet at the same time, I see a slight deviant side to his personality–a side that makes me pause slightly. I have hesitation to trust him completely. And ironically, I don’t see this side of him in all of his photos, but is clearly there, which means he could have fooled people. People may not have seen it either.
In the limited photos we see of him on the internet, he also expresses contempt multiple times, which is notable. Both the deviant look in some of the photos, and this expression give me pause and concern, though by themselves do not mean anything conclusive. They just show a potential for behavior that one must consider. No one can ever conclusively predict behavior. We can only say one has a higher propensity for certain behaviors.
When I read that the captain’s wife and children left him the day before the flight — that concerns me on multiple levels. I’d be curious to know why.
These are important factors to identify when determining potential propensities for actions that one might take.
People who are highly compassionate have a higher propensity to commit suicide as well–so we must consider that.
Could the captain have committed suicide by taking the plane down? Could he have been so desperately upset that his wife left him, that he veered off course in deep emotional distress in contemplation of suicide and then dove the plane straight down?
Did he struggle for hours about it?
Did he lock the co-pilot out of the cockpit? All are plausible with a compassionate person under life’s stressful situations.
Or did his devious side come out and plan something sinister out of anger or feelings of rejection, or something else? Was his rejection by his wife instantaneous or building over time?
When I look at the co-pilot, Fariq Abdul Hamid, I see a very honest, straight-shooter personality. What you see is what you get. He is polite, respectful, and is one to follow the rules. He takes the world at face value, whereas the pilot was a deep thinker and contemplated many things. The pilot was one to think outside the box. The co-pilot, however, hummed along in life much more lightly. He is much more easy going, accepting of life as it was, and his circumstances. The co-pilot’s mantra was like, “Things are what they are–don’t fret over them.” He wasn’t one to dwell on issues. He was one to quickly recover from adversity and moved on to life’s next adventure.
It’s also possible the plane was taken over by terrorists, or the plane had a catastrophic failure. I am open to all potentials. I’ve flown enough flights to know that when a pilot takes a flight, he, like everyone else, has to use the bathroom and in that moment, all planes are vulnerable to attack and infiltration into the cockpit by sinister people.
This post is a continuation/expansion on this post which was written before Bobby Cutts, Jr. was arrested.
What are some of the other clues that hinted to me that Cutts wasn’t being honest?
For a comparison — right after that when Cutts was asked if he had an attorney –Cutts puts confidence behind his statement when he says the word “yes”. There is more behind that word then when he said “no”. Yet the more serious question was by far the first one where the stakes were exceptionally high. We should have heard a strong enunciative response. We didn’t and that difference clued me in, and raised my eyebrows.
“The past five …five days.. have been a like nightmare that that …won’t end, like…every…every second of it , I mean when it seems like it’s turning… and gonna change… it goes back to same, or it gets worse … its different…the way I’ve been…. betrayed and just, I mean I haven’t been myself. I…I can’t sleep. I can’t eat. Anybody that knows me knows me that if I’m normal joking around and laughing…trying to have fun and make everyone else laugh and…it’s juss….just been hell.”
If I plugged into the equation the what-if-he-did-this-scenario — it all seemed to add up. He was upset that he was being looked at as a suspect — and the stress of being looked at as a suspect was overwhelming him. When the police looked at him closely and then retreated again — it was a living hell for him. He was falling apart wondering if and when the dam was going to break — and the uncertainty of it all was driving him insane. It would make sense why he couldn’t eat or sleep — and why Jessie wasn’t the focus of his thoughts. Cutts was breaking under the pressure and this fit with his behavior and words — and actions — to a tee. Every other scenario I plugged in had inconsistencies.
Furthermore, Cutts backed it up again when he answered Todd Porter’s question if he had a fourth child on the way with Jessie. Cutts said “Possibly, yes”. Again, for an innocent person — the words “possibly” would NEVER enter into their mind. They would be hanging on to every shred of hope they could muster. But when someone has something to do with harming someone, they often “distance” themselves from things.
To come to these conclusions, it’s important I share with you that I am constantly doing a balancing act between what is said, how a person is behaving, feeling and acting. Alone a piece of information may be potentially logical — but in a puzzle, a square piece will never fit in a round hole.
The other day my parents went to visit a local eye doctor to get their prescription renewed for their eyes glasses. My dad was diagnosed with glaucoma several years ago now, so he sees an eye specialist frequently — but this specialist doesn’t do regular eye-glass exams. Hence why he was visiting this doctor on this day.
My dad’s glaucoma specialist is well known in his field and recommended one of his past students to my parents — so my parents made an appointment and went to the recommended eye doctor.
My mom was the first patient. Dr. X treated her as if she wasn’t there, she says — or as if she were a non-entity. He did his job, was brief in his words and then he saw my dad. As my mom reflected upon her quick exam, she didn’t like the doctor’s demeanor. He was rude and she had decided she wouldn’t come back again.
Then when the doctor visited my dad, and realized my dad had glaucoma, his demeanor completely changed. He immediately came out, and got my mom — and was super friendly. All of the sudden, my mom was someone to notice.
He took my mom into the exam room with my dad and he started talking about the seriousness of my dad’s eye condition — and then promptly went on to scare the life out of both of them. This new doctor said my dad’s eye pressure was very high (which can be dangerous). He went on explain that my dad’s tear ducts were about to close and that could cause a serious medical emergency at any time which my parents had never heard about before.
He explained to my dad that the emergency could cause my dad blurred vision, vomiting, headaches — and could cause my dad blindness within hours unless the pressure was resolved and resolved quickly.
He went on to tell my parents that my dad should consider doing an iridotomy — where they laser a small hole in the eye to help reduce the pressure. He also told my dad he had cataracts, which were just starting (my dad didn’t know about this either) — but those cataracts cause eye pressure to increase — so they should have those removed too. Promptly.
This doctor went so far as to tell my dad he called his glaucoma specialist and told him that his specialist backed this doctor’s recommendations. With that, he tried to schedule my parents to come in the following Monday to start with the iridotomy and cataract removal!
My mom, who is also a truth wizard, was on to him — though nonetheless unnerved. She had no intentions of switching doctors — so what was this doctor thinking? She came home, rang me up — and asked what I thought.
I, too, noted that the change in demeanor was the first red flag that this guy was a less-than-honest individual. When my parents were there just for an eye exam — they were just a frustration to this doctor. They weren’t a good source of money. However, when the doctor saw money in my dad’s glaucoma — all of the sudden my parents were deserving of lots of attention! That’s scary. Suddenly, the doctor was energetic, interested and full of information.
But worse, he scared the hell out of them, gave them urgent time-frames and wanted to take action immediately. He also had no regard for the fact my dad already had a glaucoma specialist — he didn’t need a plain-old-eye-doctor calling the shots! That was the second huge red-flag that substantiated the first red flag. This man was not trustworthy.
You see, my dad had just seen his specialist two weeks before — and they had noted my dad’s pressure was elevated — but they were trying a new medication and giving it a reasonable and safe period of time to see if they could affect safe changes. It was during this last visit, that my parents were concerned and my dad’s specialist said not to be — there were still plenty of options before surgery. Then this new guy scared the hell out of them, unnecessarily!!
I set out to investigate what this new eye doctor was telling my dad. I couldn’t find anything anywhere on the web that says cataracts in themselves cause higher eye pressure in glaucoma patients or that they should be removed due to glaucoma.
After an hour of intense searching, I finally found out that advanced cataracts (defined as limiting vision and seriously impacting quality of life) can affect eye pressure. However, my dad was no where near this point. Essentially, what the doctor said versus what I found on the web were not in agreement. I suspect the doctor was stretching the truth for money.
My dad called his specialist and told him what this doctor had said to him. My dad asked if he should try another medication at once — or perhaps come in to review what to do — and my dad’s specialist said he didn’t see any reason for alarm and he’d see him as previously scheduled on March 1st. My dad also got the feeling that perhaps this other doctor never even called his doctor when they discussed it. We will never know for sure.
When people change their demeanor — and there is something to gain that can cause a change of demeanor — like in this situation — this doctor realized he had a great potential to do lots of procedures and make money off of my dad’s glaucoma — it’s time to run — and run fast!!! This guy wasn’t out to care for my parents. He was out for the all mighty buck.
Busted!
