“We All Look the Same When We Lie”

I love this promo, but it’s not my favorite. I’m saving that one for last!

* Quote above from the video (Fox).

My Thoughts: Poll on Deception Clues

Now that all of you have voted on what you think are my biggest clues to deception, I thought I would share with you my thoughts.

I feel strongly that my two biggest tip-offs that someone is lying are inconsistencies in emotions, and odd word choices. These are what I believe are my two biggest clues.

Read moreNext I would have to say is inconsistencies in fact, followed by inconsistencies in personality/character, and microexpressions. The last two being interchangeable.

  1. Inconsistencies in emotions
  2. Odd word choices
  3. Inconsistencies in fact
  4. Inconsistencies in personality/character
  5. Microexpressions

Here are your thoughts:


Microexpressions aren’t all that common, or if they are, I don’t always consciously notice them, and I don’t blog about seeing them all that much. I have to wonder: Do I see them, register them into my equation, but I am not conscious of them? I don’t know.

I took a few minutes to review a handful of cases in my blog to see what clues I truly used most, and I have to say I was surprised. Of course this is nothing scientific, and could totally change if we reviewed every case I have discussed, but it is interesting nonetheless:

Anna Ayala’s son: inconsistent emotions, odd word choices
John Mark Karr: inconsistent emotions, inconsistent facts
Ted Haggard: inconsistent emotions
Britney Spears: odd word choices, inconsistent emotions
Howard K. Stern: inconsistent emotions, questionable facts
Adam Saleh: inconsistent emotions
Bobby Cutts: odd word choices, inappropriate voice inflection

What do you think?

Interpreting Body Language: The Head Shake

A reader asked me the following:

I have a question that I wonder would be of interest to your website viewers. On this video clip, Hillary Clinton keeps make affirmative statements, but her head keeps shaking “no”. The back and forth ‘no’ motion on her head seems to be opposite her words, and it is very distracting. I do not have any political judgments, so I am not being biased about Hillary. I just am perplexed. Her body language makes me feel very uneasy and mistrustful.

This interview with Senator Clinton is just after she won the New Hampshire primaries.

What Senator Clinton is doing here is what I would call a head swagger. It’s actually her confidence that is causing this, and it is not what I would call a head shake no when she is saying something affirmative.

Read moreWhen people shake their head no when they say yes (a gesture, I believe), it is a quick, swift movement. It comes from the subconscious, and it is most alway brief. It doesn’t languish on like this does, and furthermore, when conscious thoughts kick in, the person usually stops the “no” movement abruptly and switch to a “yes” motion. You can see the thoughts “kick-in” to conscious awareness. It quite fast, and fascinating to witness.

I bet if you were to ask Senator Clinton if she was aware that she was shaking her head in this interview, she would tell you she had no idea until she witnessed it firsthand by watching the video herself.

Here is another post on the head shake (sentence and link added 10/09).

Got a question about a candidates body language or facial expression? Ask me.

Note to Readers:
(1)
I do not endorse any candidate. I am merely trying to help people understand the candidates as best as I can. (2) I do not wish to get involved in the political debate. I merely wish to answer genuine and honest questions about body language, and facial expressions.(3) As long as I believe I can remain unbiased, I will continue to do so. (4) I do not moderate my comments, and I don’t plan to, but if people decided to make my blog a political place to vent, I will start moderating until the elections are finished, or I will stop talking about politicians in general. (5) Respectful opinions are welcome, however, political bashing will not be tolerated.

Deception Blog Commentary

One blog I check out from time-to-time is Deception Blog. This blog’s purpose is to “collate information about psychological research on deception, and the applications of this research.” Yes, it is for the most part academic, but it is quite interesting nonetheless. If you haven’t visited there, I highly recommend it.

It was a pleasure to see Deception Blog post a commentary on my post about TSA Behavior Detection Officers. It is always nice to get support of other people who study deception detection.

On that note, at the bottom of the post, you will see a link to a YouTube video where Dr. Paul Ekman talks about “Why We Lie”. For those of you deception detection junkies, you will enjoy this video!

TSA Behavior Detection Officers

Newsweek published an article online yesterday titled Smile…Or Else. It’s about TSA employees who have been trained and will be stationed at airports to look for microexpressions in an attempt to thwart potential danger.

Patti Davis, the author, gives her opinion without taking the time to educate herself in the theory of microexpressions. Instead, she spouts off like an uneducated fool afraid of what she doesn’t know. I would expect more from Newsweek magazine.

Read more
Davis writes a brief description of microexpressions, but obviously doesn’t understand the meaning of the word “concealed” and how it applies to microexpressions:

In the study of “micro-expressions”—yes, it is actually a field of study and there are some who are arrogant enough to call it a science—it has been decided that when people wish to conceal emotions, the truth of their feelings is revealed in facial flashes. These experts have determined that fear and disgust are the key things to look for because they can hint of deception.

Davis seems to think that if you have a bad day and are not happy — or perhaps are flying to a funeral for a family member, the Behavior Detection Officers are going to nab you.

…what about the woman who is getting on a plane to see a dying relative? Or the man who is traveling to another state to see a cancer specialist in a last bid for extending his life? What about the guy who just had a fight with his spouse and now worries that a plane crash would mean their last words were in anger? We’ve all had the experience of having a bad day, being in a rotten mood—especially at the airport, which has become a modern-day chamber or [sic] horrors. On those days, doesn’t it seem like everyone we meet looks sour and unpleasant?

Davis does not connect the dots that the people she just described have no reason to conceal emotions.

If a woman is getting on a plane to see a dying friend, she will likely feel sadness. She isn’t going to try and act like this is the happiest day of her life now, is she? She has no reason to conceal anything.

Take as well the man who is traveling to another state to see a cancer specialist in a last bid to extend his life. He, too, will have genuine feelings of sadness and perhaps fear, but he also has no reason to conceal his feelings either. We can pretty much bet this man has only one thing on his mind: survival. He is not going to be role-playing some deceptive scheme.

As for the poor guy who had a fight with his wife before boarding the plane and is afraid of crashing, he isn’t going to put on an act either. He will likely be silent in his thoughts and regrets, and those emotions, whether he is consciously aware of it or not, will be displayed on his face in a natural progressive order. He won’t leak out expressions in micro-bursts that are inconsistent with what he is feeling, for Pete’s sake.

These are not people who would tip off someone who can read and is properly trained in seeing microexpressions but Davis didn’t do her homework.

All people feel and express emotions on their face pretty continuously during waking hours. That is normal and nothing that should set off a TSA officer. You should be able to smile, cry, pout, weep and even be afraid without worry that you are going to set off well-trained personnel.

Then what are these Behavior Detection Officers looking for? Do you really have something to worry about? It’s not likely.

Someone who sees microexpressions will be looking for the guy who is showing inconsistencies in emotions, and behavior. For example, he will look for a guy who is acting jovial, yet strangely preoccupied and flashes an expression of disgust or fear across his face simultaneously.

I am happy to report the average person will not be this complex. They likely won’t have the conflicting behaviors and emotions that cause microexpressions. It is only the guy who is trying to conceal his true feelings that will leak clues, unconsciously. Microexpressions are not voluntary behaviors.

It is the inconsistent micro-burst expressions lasting 1/25th of a second that should set off the TSA Behavior Detection Officers.

If I offered you the lottery to make a microexpression right now on demand, I can stand with 100% confident that you couldn’t do it. It’s not that simple, folks.

As with all things new and not understood, fear and anger are common defenses until the unknown becomes familiar, and the value of something new becomes recognized.