If you didn’t get to watch 48 Hours this weekend, you missed a fascinating real life whodunnit story. Robyn Davis’ husband, Brian Davis, is found murdered in a remote area and it doesn’t take police long to zero in on Robyn and her best friend Cissy.
The only evidence police have against Robyn is her cell phone records. They say they bounced near a town near where the murder occurred.
When you watch Robyn Davis, what do you think? I am traveling this week, but when I can, I will post my thoughts about Robyn.
https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg00Eyes for Lieshttps://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpgEyes for Lies2012-10-08 12:26:002012-10-08 12:26:00Robyn Davis Interrogation
Did you catch Final Witness this week? The show was titled What the Boy Saw and was the season finale. They profiled the story of Hans and Nina Reiser. Nina went missing in 2006 in Oakland, California, and ultimately her husband, Hans, led police to her body after he was convicted of first degree murder in exchange for a reduced sentence.
The show gave the title because police believe that
https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg00Eyes for Lieshttps://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpgEyes for Lies2012-08-10 13:51:002012-08-10 13:51:00Final Witness: Hans and Nina Reiser
video platformvideo managementvideo solutionsvideo player
I have to say that when I saw the news today that Andrea Sneiderman was arrested for murdering her husband, Russell, I was pleased. I was in NYC doing training when I first saw Andrea on TV and her behavior flat out didn’t sit well with me. This woman was cold and callous and her behavior didn’t square with a bereaved wife.
I think
https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg00Eyes for Lieshttps://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpgEyes for Lies2012-08-02 16:09:002012-08-02 16:09:00Andrea Sneiderman Arrested for Murder
When the jury for the Drew Peterson trial was being selected, guess who participated in their selection? None other than Drew Peterson himself.
Drew Peterson’s attorney, Joel Brodsky even said to the media, “We have the ultimate jury consultant and that’s ah…Drew Peterson.”
Yes, you can say that’s no surprise because Drew Peterson is arrogant, but on this one, I have to agree he is likely very good at reading people, understanding people’s vulnerabilities and weaknesses as well as their strengths!
Smart psychopaths can read people extremely well!
https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg00Eyes for Lieshttps://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpgEyes for Lies2012-07-25 14:22:002015-03-16 10:59:36Drew Peterson “Ultimate Jury Consultant” says Lawyer
When I listen to Zimmerman speak, I see a man who has not only been coached to speak, but I also see a man who is incredibly inconsistent and self-centered. This is all about Zimmerman. It’s a public media campaign to win the public over, but as a body language and deception expert, he’s failed miserably.
He is not confident in what he is saying, doesn’t own the words that come out of his mouth and shows us this by the vast amount of clues that he leaves behind in his wake. These are not his natural thoughts, if you want my opinion–not even close. I quiver to hear what Zimmerman really thinks.
I can pick out the words, the sentences, the points he was told to make. They jump at me like lightening on a dark night.
Zimmerman is also very inconsistent and can’t even get one minute into the interview–on his first question–when he says he hasn’t had time to reflect and then he immediately says that’s had lots of time to reflect. He is all over the place because he’s not being genuine to himself or us. If he is honest, he’d have no reason to jump all over, but he clearly is jumping all over. He’s like split mercury on the floor– try to pin it down and you can’t!
Zimmerman’s speech is also choppy because he is thinking constantly as he speaks. Why does he feel the need to be so controlled? Honest people’s words flow when they speak because honest thoughts come to us as second nature.
Why doesn’t he have any emotions about taking someone’s life?
If I killed someone in self-defense, even if it was justified, I would still be sad that I was put in that position–that I had no option but to take a life. That would disturb me and most people. I might even be mad, but not Zimmerman. He’s arrogant and self-righteous, yet gives us no credible reason to sympathize with his behavior that night. He gives us nothing to feel he was truly in a position where he had to take a life. His story is so inconsistent, its without question unbelievable.
We also aren’t seeing normal emotions in Zimmerman because I believe he feels he has to suppress himself, or he will never stand a chance.
I also don’t believe Zimmerman that he’s never heard of the stand your ground law. Did you see that sheepish smile?
I don’t have a clue where Hannity is getting the idea that Martin reached for something when he first alledgedly circled Zimmerman in his car. This is news to me. However, about this incident Zimmerman says to Hannity, “I was certain I could see him saying something to me.” Really? In Zimmerman’s written statement to police, which was taken right after the incident, he actually hand wrote these words, “I could not hear if he said anything.”
This is the third analysis I have done of Zimmerman and in each one, it is littered with changing stories, and inconsistencies.
Now read this shenanigans: It speaks for itself.
HANNITY: …then we get to the issue where you said to — on the 911 call that he’s running. You said that to the dispatch. Is there any chance in retrospect as you look back on that night and what happened, and the nation obviously is paying a lot of attention to this– ZIMMERMAN: Yes, sir. HANNITY: — trying to maybe get into the mind-set, because we also have learned that Trayvon was speaking with his girlfriend supposedly at the time — that maybe he was afraid of you, didn’t know who you were? ZIMMERMAN: No. HANNITY: You don’t think — why do you think that he was running then? ZIMMERMAN: Maybe I said running, but he was more — HANNITY: You said he’s running. ZIMMERMAN: Yes. He was like skipping, going away quickly. But he wasn’t running out of fear. HANNITY: You could tell the difference? ZIMMERMAN: He wasn’t running. HANNITY: So he wasn’t actually running? ZIMMERMAN: No, sir. HANNITY: OK. Because that’s what you said to the dispatcher, that you thought he was running.
When someone will change a story like this to support their beliefs, its clear we aren’t going to get anything reliable from Zimmerman outside of more manipulation and control and deceit.
I’m hoping to get more time to watch the rest of this! I haven’t made it to “Gods Plan” yet. I think I could write a novel on Zimmerman’s inconsistencies!
https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg00Eyes for Lieshttps://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpgEyes for Lies2012-07-20 11:36:002012-07-20 11:36:00My Analysis of George Zimmerman on Hannity