To get up to date on this story, read about it on Wikipedia.
Here is an interesting video where you can hear a convicted killer, Bradley Murdoch, talk about the crime he is convicted of. He claims innocence, yet his words are very telling.
Listen to Murdoch speak. He says, “…a lot of my close immediate friends know that I sort of didn’t do it.”
He sort of didn’t do it? How is that possible?
He either did it or he didn’t, but when people use hedge words like “sort of” in the middle of a definitive statement, it is a clue that they are subconsciously hedging. They can’t quite commit to say something that is not true, and hence the clue leaks out without their knowledge. Our brain is interesting this way, isn’t it? Murdoch also talks about the surviving victim, Johanne Lees, in an attempt to discredit her. He says, “There’s things, um, that she sort of totally got wrong.”
Hmmm…He could say there are things that she totally got wrong, but why add sort of? It shows a lack of conviction in his own statement again!
Please note that I believe to call someone dishonest, you need at least three solid clues. The use of hedge words would be one clue.
There are many clues to deception including emotional clues and leakages in the form of micro expressions, factual leakage or inconsistencies, behavioral clues, and cognitive clues.
https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg00Eyes for Lieshttps://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpgEyes for Lies2011-08-03 15:39:002011-08-03 15:39:00Convicted Murder Speaks: What do his words reveal?
Are you wondering if someone is lying to you? And you don’t know how to find out if they are?
Many people write me all the time saying that they suspect someone is lying to them, and ask me for advice. Without being there to watch a person’s behavior, and with many people unsure of their own ability to judge behavior accurately, there is one thing anyone can do to spot a lie.
What is it you ask?
Fact check, plain and simple. Simply checking facts can be quite revealing. Liars are not usually good at keeping facts straight, and often leak clues to their deception, if you pay attention. The problem is most people overlook the leaks and discount them.
Last week, a woman wrote to me and said a friend had told her she had twins, but she never, ever saw them and she never talked about them around other people. She was suspicious and with good reason, and she was listening to her gut instincts.
What I advised her to do was go on her friend’s Facebook page and post a question like, “I’d love to see a photo of your beautiful twins. How about a picture? I bet they look just like you!”
An honest person would be happy to respond to that request, even if they do it privately, but a dishonest person would get defensive, and more than likely delete the request because they don’t want other people seeing their falsehoods.
What happened upon investigating this is that the woman who wrote me found that her friend wouldn’t let her friends post on her Facebook page. That immediately sends up alarms. Either the person is very insecure, or they are hiding something. Now you have two red flags in a short period of time: not ever seeing or meeting the “twins,” and now limitations in the flow of information.
So the woman wrote her privately asking to see photos of the twins and guess what? She was chewed out and blocked. Blocked. What mom of twins would act so outrageously? The questioner found out that it is likely her friend was being deceptive because she had no reason to go off like that on a simple request. That is three hot spots in a short period of time.
Fact finding can be as simple as asking the right questions or it can be more complex of keeping track of dates and times to see if there are discrepancies, or digging around to see if there is supportive evidence. I believe you need three solid hot spots before you decide someone is being untrustworthy, at the very minimum. In this case, these behaviors are all suspicious.
Most people who tell lies, even white lies, often forget to remember the details of their story and to most people’s surprise they drop factual clues that tell what the truth is more frequently than most people realize. But even if they don’t, you can look around a little, and ask questions and you should get a clearer picture. It’s one way most people can uncover a liar in little time. It’s much easier than people think.
https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg00Eyes for Lieshttps://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpgEyes for Lies2011-08-02 13:53:002011-08-02 13:53:00Am I being lied to?
Newly tested DNA evidence tested in the West Memphis Three case from Arkansas is no match for Damien Echols, Jason Baldwin and Jessie Misskelley Jr, who all were convicted of killing three 8-year old cub scouts. The three boys dubbed The West Memphis three, who were teenagers at the time of the crime, have now served 18 years in prison.
The DNA that was tested recently has excluded the West Memphis Three and has instead identified two unknown males and a hair reveals a third.
The three boys that lost their lives are not to be forgotten. We need to find their real killers. They were Stevie Branch, Christopher Byers and Michael Moore.
To read my original thoughts on this case, click here. Or click on the labels below to read all I have written on this case.
https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg00Eyes for Lieshttps://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpgEyes for Lies2011-07-30 09:34:002011-07-30 09:34:00No DNA link to West Memphis Three
Things are not looking good for the case against Drew Peterson. Could this be another Casey Anthony case where the majority of people know from behavior that Peterson is guilty, but he walks?
It doesn’t look good.
Click here to read my review of Drew Peterson in the Today Show interview shown in the clip above.
https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg00Eyes for Lieshttps://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpgEyes for Lies2011-07-28 15:55:002011-07-28 15:55:00Drew Peterson Case in Jeopardy: Another Casey Anthony?
This is a fascinating story with a huge lesson. Time and time again I hear women who ended up in bad relationships say, “I know he lied, but it was harmless.” When people continually lie, it is one of the biggest warning signals you have that the person you are invested in a relationship, friend or otherwise, values themselves way more than you. And when a person puts them first, watch out! You will end up hurt, one way or another.
Lying repeatedly shows a lack of respect by the person who is lying and to the people being lied to. It will never end happily. And if you stick around, it shows you don’t respect yourself either. You should want more for your life!
It’s your number reason to boogie, folks. I have always had a steadfast rule in personal intimate relationships. If someone lies to me once, I’ll forgive them, if they are sincere and I truly believe their apology. If they lie to me twice, its over. It’s clear we didn’t learn from the first mistake and I am not going to repeat it again.
The only exclusion I have are friends who give me white lies when they cancel things, reschedule or are unable to be honest about their own shortcomings or difficulties, which have no bearing on me or other people.
Lies are not harmless when they continually repeat. Remember that…
https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg00Eyes for Lieshttps://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpgEyes for Lies2011-07-28 15:31:002011-07-28 15:31:00Harmless Lies Mount Up