Missing Zahra Baker

Little 10-year old Zahra Baker went missing from the family home this past Saturday. Zahra has bone cancer and lost a leg and her hearing to the disease. She wears a prosthetic leg and hearing aids. Police issued an Amber Alert in the case and the FBI and U.S. Marshals have been looking for Zahra.

Read moreFrom ABC.com:

Elisa Baker has been arrested for making threats, writing bad checks, larceny and driving with a revoked driver’s license, according to The Associated Press. She is being held on $31,500 bond.

In this interview we see Zahra’s father, Adam Baker, speak. He raises my eyebrows.

Adam was asked in the interview if he believed his wife was involved and he replied, “I wouldn’t like to think so. It’s kind of what I’ve heard so far. It could be possible.”

It’s “kind of” what he heard? Why is he waffling, if this is what he believes or is being led to believe?

George asks Adam if the last time he saw his daughter was at 2:30 a.m. Saturday when she was sleeping in her bed. Adam says, “Uh, that’s what time her mother told me she went and checked on her–when I was asleep.”

George continues, “So when was the last time you saw Zahra?” Watch how Adam has to think to answer that. It’s odd. He says, “It would’ve been…probably Thursday night and I got up early and went to work…”

Probably?

He doesn’t know when he saw his daughter last? Usually when people go missing, the first thing we do is go back to the last time we saw them and think about it. Did we tell them we loved them? Did we kiss them?

If Adam and Elisa believed their daughter was abducted, you would think they would retrace all their steps from their last accounts to see if anything was unusual or extraordinary, wouldn’t you? And he isn’t even confident the last time he saw his daughter? Red flag. I also find it odd how he immediately accounts for his time the next morning. Its like he is trying to cover himself. Why would he care if he knows he had no involvement? It’s noteworthy.

I wonder what the fire was that was burning at 5:30 in the morning? That piques my interest.

I am surprised at how Adam responds to George about checking on Zahra after the fire. He seems to think before he answers here, too. He hesitates a lot. He says, “…..um…..no. I was in big panic because there was a fire in the yard and I was talking to investigators.” Its plausible, of course, but his response is noteworthy to me–how he thinks about it before answering. Why doesn’t he just say “No. I figured she slept through the whole thing. She wasn’t in danger so we didn’t want to worry her.” It’s like he never thought about it at all. Did he know she wasn’t there at that point?

What were they doing up at 5:30 to even see the fire? Was it a building fire or just the yard? I’d like to know more about the fire.

Adam then leaves the house at 11:00 a.m. or noon on Saturday to check out a job, and yet doesn’t think any of not seeing his daughter that morning? Isn’t that odd? Most ten year old children are up long before noon.

Then it wasn’t until 2:00 PM that the parents reported Zahra missing? That doesn’t add up.

Adam says that when he came back from the job that morning, he was working in the yard and that is when Elisa came out of the house and “started screaming that Zahra was missing.” That means Adam wants us to believe he came home and never questioned where his daughter was. Either he was really uncaring and unconcerned about his daughter, or we are not getting the real story here.

George questions Adam about what Elisa knew and Adam says, “Uh, she didn’t know very much. She came out crying and panicking…just like telling me Zahra was gone….um, I went inside and searched the house and started searching around the block (head shake no) and…called the police.”

The words “just like” flag me here. As if she did this, but perhaps really didn’t? It’s a hedge…Ronald Cummings did this as well.

If notice Adam doesn’t give us any details about Elisa said. This is a huge flags me. He should be giving us details. He should have fears, emotional memories, etc, but he doesn’t give us any of this. Alarms ringing.

Adam seems to be resigned his daughter is not out there for some reason. I see no hope that they will find her. Maybe he knows things that the police aren’t revealing?

I think Adam knows more than he is telling, but what that is, of course, I don’t claim to know.

Tiffany Hartley “As far as I know”

Tiffany Hartley speaks out again and again and again. Here is another interview from a Fox morning show.

What I find so fascinating in this interview is the reporter say to Tiffany something to this effect: Is it true that you knew there was risk involved and that your motto is no fear? Tiffany says that’s true. Isn’t that ironic? Last week, she said about her husband, “He would never put me in a position in danger and we hadn’t heard anything, um, going on over there. We had heard of about the pirates, but we didn’t know…we just hadn’t heard anything recently.”

Read moreWatch Tiffany shake her head in this interview and nod. She is all over the table as is her story.

When the reporter says, “They shot your husband in the back of the head?” Tiffany responds with a shockingly new response, “As far as I know.”

WHAT? If she turned him over, she would know for sure he was shot in the head. Her statement clearly show she is doubting herself. Why would she doubt what she supposedly knows happened? This is a really big red flag.

When Tiffany responds to the accusations that the Mexican authorities don’t believe her, watch how she sobs yet not one tear falls. “He was my rock. He was everything to me,” she says.

She keeps licking her lips in this video. I suspect she has a dry mouth, which can come from being nervous. Why on earth would she be nervous if she has nothing to hide?

Where do you read Eyes for Lies blog?

Several months back, I decided to ask my readers to send me photos of where they read my blog. It’s been a lot of fun seeing your faces and where you live! We’ve seen readers from London, New Zealand, Dubai, Japan, Australia, and the United States. Thanks for all of those who have joined in, and if you haven’t, we’d love to see you! You can read more about it here.

One reader, Louana, and her husband, Yasu, have been enthusiastic about sharing where they read my blog. They’ve traveled the world and taken me along. First we started in Japan where Yasu is from, and then Louana went to her homeland in The Netherlands and now she has moved to San Francisco and taken us to Alcatraz! Very cool, Louana! Alcatraz.

Thanks Louana and Yasu for sharing in the fun with us! It’s been a blast going on your world tour with you!!

Louana writes a great blog. You can read it here.

See more photos here!

Oksana Grigorieva

45789, LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA - Wednesday October 6, 2010. Oksana Grigorieva braves the rain as she arrives at an office building in Culver City. Oksana's troubles have continue as she has recently cut ties with her bodyguard Kristian Otto Herzog after she found out that he is an ex-felon. Photograph: Juan Sharma,  PacificCoastNews.com

Oksana Grigorieva spoke out to People Magazine about her problems with Mel Gibson. She talks about how Mel came after her, threatened her and pulled a gun on her, and then threatened to kill himself.

Do you think she is telling the truth?

Read moreI don’t think it takes any rocket science to know that Mel Gibson has a temper. We’ve all heard it for ourselves in the past few months, which makes the likelihood that something could have happened higher than usual.

Is he capable of pulling a gun out and threatening Oksana? Absolutely. The rage we heard in his voice is pretty predictive of his lack of emotional control.

Do I believe something happened on January 6? I do.

Oksana appears to show genuine sadness over the event, but I don’t see fear, which is odd.

I also find it odd how she talks about the gun that day. She says, “And then he pulls a gun out.” Notice how she shrugs her shoulders. That’s not a conclusive hot spot for me (alone as honest people do this), but it is noteworthy. Then she hedges when she says, “And he, you know, he pulls a gun out basically, and he wants to kill us all.”

Basically? He either did or he did not. Why is she minimizing this? This flags me. She also doesn’t speak in past tense when talking about this. She says it in present with the words “wants” instead of wanted.

She continues, and says, “And then he says (shoulder shrug) if I leave then…he’s going to…um…..blow his brains out on the wall (shrug). There was no logic in what he was saying.” When she says this, I see that she is a bit indignant. I suspect he did say said this at one point or another. Did he say it that night? I don’t know.

At the end when she talks about him beating her up when she was holding the baby in her arms, she definitely was concerned for her children. I have no doubt about that, but I’d like to question Oksana about the gun incident. I’m not convinced, but I can’t rule it out at this point. I’d need to see more. Most people who someone pulled a gun on them would be terrified–especially if they were holding their children, as Oksana says.

According to People Magazine, the L.A. Sherrif is investigating Oksana to see if she used the audio tapes to extort Gibson.