Nancy Grace had on a woman who claims to have babysat baby Gabriel in December for Elizabeth Johnson. Her story, which seems credible to me, doesn’t look good for baby Gabriel. According to the babysitter, he was scared, dirty, without toys and Elizabeth said if he cried too much, to just drug him (that he was already drugged up!). Elizabeth picked the babysitter from Craiglist and didn’t know a thing about her, according to the babysitter.
Many of you have asked me to share my thoughts on the Smiths. I did so here on my Topic Suggestion Page.
https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg00Eyes for Lieshttps://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpgEyes for Lies2010-01-18 12:08:002010-01-18 12:08:00Baby Gabriel’s Babysitter
What is so fascinating about the Bruce Mullenix in the video is his body language when he speaks. After Erin Moriarity says Bruce had a “rock solid alibi” the night of the murder, if you only watched Bruce’s body language and tried to discern if he was honest or not here, you would likely conclude Bruce was being deceptive. He shakes his head no when he says yes, and he shrugs his shoulders when he says “Yeah, and I knew that” to Erin Moriarity.
Read moreYet Bruce is NOT lying here. If you thought he was, you’d be clearly mistaken.
The reason I point this out is because there is not one universal clue to deception, and I want people to see this conclusively. Yes, shrugging of the shoulder, or shaking of the head opposite to verbal clues can indicate deception, but when you see it, it doesn’t always mean that someone is being deceptive.
We know that what Bruce is saying here is the truth. The police made him a suspect, their number one suspect at the time, and cleared him. Bruce Mullenix was also out of town when his ex-wife, Barbara, was murdered. And to back it all up, I believed Bruce when I saw him talk. His behaviors were very consistent with what he was saying to me.
Well, how could that be, you ask?
For me, deception detection is not all about the clues. I can’t stress that enough. When I look at a person, I have an immediate sense of their personality. I don’t know if it is facial features, or expressions, but I can usually tell people many facts about a stranger with stunning accuracy, without ever saying a word to them — by simply looking at them, or a photo of them (see what I call paralleling). With that, I listen to what a person says, to see if it matches their personality type, and their typical, expected behavior. That’s how I come to the conclusion whether someone’s behavior is natural and honest, or deceptive, much of the time. The clues only come as supportive evidence for me.
Dr. Maureen O’Sullivan says it best when she says, “They [wizards otherwise known as naturals] seem to have templates of people that they use to make sense of the behavioural deviations they observe… So it is not a set of disembodied cues, but embedded behaviours that are consistent with each other as well as with the kind of person exhibiting them (source).”
So next time you spot a clue to deception, don’t be quick to call someone a liar by one or two clues alone. The process is a lot more complex than what it appears on the surface. I personally recommend focusing on the facts and looking for inconsistencies, first. That will be much more reliable and trustworthy for the average person. Had we done that in this case as well, Bruce would have been cleared quickly, and focus would have fallen where it should, on Rachael Mullenix and Ian Allen.
https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg00Eyes for Lieshttps://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpgEyes for Lies2010-01-13 16:55:002010-01-13 16:55:00A Word of Caution
According to Fox News, Josh Powell is putting up his house for sale (Thanks, Russ, for the update). That’s obviously not a good sign, if it is true.
Listen to Josh’s neighbor, Tim Peterson, talk about Josh. Tim tried to retrieve a swing set he lent to the Powells. Do you hear the frustration and anger in Tim’s voice? It’s biting, isn’t it? What indications in Tim’s voice let you know he is angry and frustrated?
https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg00Eyes for Lieshttps://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpgEyes for Lies2010-01-07 12:28:002010-01-07 12:28:00Josh Powell Selling House? Neighbor Speaks
Many of you have written to me and asked me to review the video of Josh Powell. The police have named him a person of interest in the disappearance of his wife, Susan, and they say he has not been cooperative with them. I think most people see that Josh’s behavior is definitely abnormal and I do not disagree. Josh, if you want my opinion, knows more than he is telling us. He couldn’t look more like a deer caught in headlights than he does here in this interview. He is constantly thinking before he speaks, doesn’t answer questions directly, and he shows little to no concern for his wife at all.
Read moreHere are my thoughts when I watch the video:
When the interview first starts and the reporter asks Josh how he is doing, I find it interesting how Josh has to think about it before he answers the question. He says after a pause, “Um…. well, I’ve been trying to figure out….what I can do so I don’t sit idle….” Does this make any sense? If your wife disappeared and you didn’t know what happened to her, would you worry about occupying your time so you don’t “sit idle”?Now imagine the flip side, that you do know what happened to your wife and it was haunting you, would idol time be a big concern? Josh’s choice of words here is haunting to me. I also find it interesting how he talks about dealing with “this”, presumably talking to the media, repeatedly. It is obviously annoying for him to talk to reporters. If he knows nothing about his wife disappearance, I would think he would welcome continued exposure to help find her, wouldn’t you?
I find it strange how Josh says, “I was just going to go in and get my kids…because….. you know….they’re family.” He clearly is not an expert at thinking on his feet and is not well versed at doing this and it shows. Many of his statements make little to no sense. He is having trouble connecting basic thoughts.
The reporter asks Josh again, “How are you doing…” and Josh answers with, “You know people have been really… helpful and supportive, so …..its been……..it’s been really hard, but…. you know, you just keep going…” Notice how Josh doesn’t answer the question? I also noticed how Josh’s thought changes in the middle of this sentence. It’s as if a vision in his mind’s eye changed his thought process. He was starting to say one thing (that people are helpful), but he changes it to how difficult it has been. More than that, it looks like he keeps making contempt and disgust expressions, doesn’t it? He has a personality that may do this naturally, so I can’t be sure. I’d like to see more footage of him to see if this is case specific or natural for him.
The reporter asks Josh to tell him what happened that night. Do you notice that Josh doesn’t answer the question directly? Instead he says, “Yeah, a….just a lot of times I just go camping with my boys…” Josh doesn’t provide any details of that night whatsoever. Instead, he talks about what they usually do–not what they did. This does not support honesty.And what information we do get from Josh makes absolutely no sense. What father takes two children under five out camping after 10 PM on a sub-freezing night? Its ridiculous, and obviously points to some sort of cover-up.
When Josh says, “I just went…. with the boys…” the pauses are indicative that he is thinking on his feet–not speaking from his memories. I also see more contempt on his face again. It’s subtle, but it seems like every time he thinks of key times during that night, he feels this emotion.
The reporter asks Josh, why he didn’t call in sick and Josh responds, “…You know… I didn’t, ah……..I was somehow thinking it was Sunday. I didn’t go to church and …I just missed a day and I thought we’ll go and come back Sunday.”Is anyone buying this? Has this happened to any of you who are married with children? Have you missed a Monday at work because you lost track of time??
When the reporter asks Josh if he has any idea of where his wife could be, watch how he swallows awkwardly as he shakes his head no. People often salivate when they are nervous and uncomfortable. Why would he be nervous if he had nothing to hide?I just keep seeing this surreal look on Josh’s face, like a “deer in headlights” look over and over again. Its a highly unusual look like he is bewildered he is where he is right now…
The reporter talks about how the husband is often the first person looked at in cases like this. Josh says, “I, um, didn’t do anything…..I don’t know where she is at….I don’t even know where to start looking.” Josh comes across as robotic here to me. He has no emotions whatsoever, which is very notable considering he is married to Susan.
The reporter ask Josh, what do you tell the boys about their mom? Before Josh speaks, watch how he awkwardly swallows again and how he makes a very distressed facial expression. Obviously this question makes him very uncomfortable. Josh then says, “By the time it all started, I’d…I was already….ah….I was already late and…went to bed and its been hectic ever since.” What is he talking about? Does this make any sense?”Hectic”? If you wife was missing, would “hectic” be the word that comes to mind?
Josh does not think quickly on his feet. That’s for sure. With that, I suspect he was not a pathological liar. He really struggles at this… It makes me wonder if he lost his temper at some point and something horrible happened. That reminds me that I read that there was a wet spot found on the carpet. If this is true, its incredibly ominous…
When the reporter ask Josh what time his wife went to bed, he just says, “She just went to bed that night.” He doesn’t give us any details again. He deflects the question with a generic statement. I suspect, sadly, that she never went to bed and that is why he doesn’t have an answer.
The reporter says, “And what time did you go camping, would you say?” Josh says, “Um…I…you know, I got out to a pretty late start.”The reporter says, “Nine-ish?”
Josh says, “No it was later.” Notice Josh doesn’t have any time frame for reference because he wasn’t paying attention to the clock. This is supportive he didn’t “plan” to go camping. If you plan to go camping with little kids, you are aware definitely aware of the time. Kids get cranky without sleep.
Josh says, “Basically……um……I’m just trying to …..figure out what I can do…and (head shake yes–as if he is confirming what he said to himself) and both try to find her and…try to…..take care of (shoulder shrug) life in general (positive self-affirmation again — indicative of someone thinking on their feet, not telling us what they know is true).”Clearly Josh is not telling us his true thoughts, if you want my opinion. He is trying to deflect, but he is horrible at it!
The reporter continues, “Where did you guys camp?”Josh replies, “Um….we went down south to the…(looks around)…to some trails down there.”
The reporter questions, “To the Moab area?”
Josh says, “No, no…uh, we actually just went down to …the…. Pony Express (self-affirmation again).”
The reporter says, “They actually have campgrounds down there?” and Josh thinks for a second and says, “Ah….I guess there is a few.” He guesses? Wasn’t he saying he was just there? If he was, he wouldn’t have to guess would he??
I believe Josh knows a heck of lot more than he is telling us. I don’t see anything in this interview that supports honesty, if you want my opinion.
https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg00Eyes for Lieshttps://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpgEyes for Lies2010-01-05 11:40:002023-01-11 20:28:10Josh Powell Interview
I am wondering if people are having a difficult time posting with the new “Echo” comment system. If you are, go to my website (not blog), click on Contact and then fill in the form and tell me. While I won’t be able to help you directly as I can’t troubleshoot your computer from mine, I will take note of it. You, however, can seek help directly here. I posted a question asking for help and got a response in 3 to 5 minutes.
Haloscan, my old comment management tool, told me I either had to move my comments to another website or I could upgrade to Echo for $9.99 (or something close to that) a year. So I upgraded. Right now, I am not so happy with it, but I am going to give it some more time. It’s just not as intuitive as Haloscan was. That’s for sure! But the positive news is that you can post pictures and videos now in the comment section and you can now log in with your log-in from facebook, twitter and several other sites! Or you can post as a guest.
https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg00Eyes for Lieshttps://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpgEyes for Lies2010-01-05 10:18:002010-01-05 10:18:00Echo Comments