Do you know a story (local, national or international) where you wonder what the truth is? If so, ask me.
All I need is a video-clip with a close-range head-shot of the suspect talking for a few minutes.
Oh, it helps tremendously if the suspect is being asked direct questions pertaining to the situation. I can’t read lies when people don’t lie. I am not a psychic. My skills are based on concrete, tangible clues.
All links welcome!
“A television producer is suing dog trainer Cesar Millan, star of TV’s The Dog Whisperer, claiming that his Labrador retriever was injured at Millan’s training facility after being suffocated by a choke collar and forced to run on a treadmill.”
* * * * * * * *
After seeing Episode 4 of the dog whisperer on the National Geographic Channel, I am confident that Cesar Millan’s motives are not out for the best interest of man or his best friend. I believe Cesar’s motives are out to line his own pockets.
In Episode 4, Mr. Millan is asked to train JonBee, who is considered a red-zone dog. A red zone dog is a dog that is very dangerous to society.
What Mr. Millan does to put JonBee in submission was simply horrifying, irresponsible and flat out unprofessional. And while I personally don’t agree with his approach, his actions in the face of his approach were reckless and dangerous to humans, and other animals. It was in his recklessness that I believe his true intentions were seen.
Mr. Millan (aka The Dog Whisperer) puts a noose around JonBee’s neck and forced him to the ground while literally strangulating the dog until the dog is so weak from lack of oxygen that he couldn’t fight back. JonBee, whose eyes were literally bulging, is about to pass out from lack of air when Cesar Millan loosens the noose and claims victory that JonBee submitted. That’s when Cesar Millan claims that the dog won’t get up and run because he has submitted.
The truth is JonBee was practically strangled to death, yet Cesar Millan never says he is using this technique though anyone can clearly see it with their own two eyes. The dog was forced to submit physically because he didn’t have the strength to respond without oxygen. After Cesar Millan removes the noose, JonBee just lays there in an exhausted pant. He doesn’t have the energy to even get up! The response from JonBee wasn’t due to “training”. It was due to physical, brutal abusive behavior.
Does Cesar think people believe he just forced the dog to the ground and he submitted? That is not what happens and you can clearly see it on the show.
Cesar Millan shows his intentions are not out for man or his best friend when he does NOT discuss his approach, or the ramifications. Instead, the Dog Whisper sits there and basks in his glory. This behavior is reckless and shows a lack of caring for man OR his best friend.
If a person believes that after nearly choking their dog to death — the dog will no longer be a danger to anyone –it is false — even after weeks of practice. An aggressive dog has to be taught not to challenge every new person it meets. It has to be given confidence and trust — not instilled with fear.
If a person attempts to do this dangerous and lethal technique incorrectly, they could seriously injure or even kill their dog. Doesn’t the dog whisperer care about this??? And worse than that, if the owner doesn’t do this technique exactly perfect — the owner himself faces getting potentially mauled. Where are Cesar Millan’s genuine concern for others? It was clearly lacking, in my opinion.
As a professional, or an expert — Cesar Millan owed these warnings and precautions to his TV audience and yet he didn’t give them! It shows his true motivations. It shows a lack of caring for dogs and their owners.
Dangerous dogs should not be wrangled with and forced into physical submission unless you know what you are doing — and I say you shouldn’t even do it then. It’s barbaric. We have mentally ill dogs like we have mentally ill people, and violence doesn’t eliminate the problem with either of them.
More than that, the owner of JonBee was hoping to rehabilitate him, and give him away. Cesar Millan was grossly negligent to not inform the public or the owner of JonBee that this training was NOT enough to ensure that this dog was no longer a danger to others. Clearly, there was much more than needed to be done! Sadly, the Dog Whisper said nothing.
Instead, the show continued on to show JonBee’s owner physically putting his dog into a submissive position without strangulation techniques three weeks later — where it was clear that JonBee outright feared his owner — and did what he believed he HAD TO do to survive. JonBee was not a happy, thriving dog who was trained. He was brutally forced to fear his owner.
Cesar Millan wants to be the big hero on the show who tamed this “wild” dog. He didn’t actually tame the dog, or put the dog into a corrected position with expertise or training. Instead, he physically deprived the dog of oxygen to the point the dog didn’t have enough life-sustaining oxygen to get up and fight back.
Okay, here is one for you.
You go out with a realtor to buy a vacation home. You are out of town. She shows you three homes in a state you are unfamiliar with. You don’t know the market trends, etc.
Two of the three homes she shows you are vacant, but they are perfect and in your price range. You want to make an offer. You are happy and satisfied with all three but have chosen one you like in particular.
Before you make an offer on one of the homes, however, the realtor tells you homes in the area are HOT, HOT, HOT and sell within a day — usually over the asking price.
Do you believe the realtor? Do make a purchase offer?
Do you offer more than the house is worth? If not, why?
To find out WHY I asked, click here.
This past weekend, I was watching the Travel Channel’s Vacation Home Search. The show follows a family around as they view three homes and purchase one for their vacation home.
Last weekend, the show featured three homes in Las Vegas. Three average middle-class homes. One of them had dark green, turf-like carpeting. It was horrendous. None of the houses were anything to look at and the average cost was around $300K.
After the realtor showed this New Jersey family the homes, the show’s commenter identified that houses in Las Vegas sell in one day — and often more than the asking price — so this couple had to act quickly if they wanted one of the houses. The show was hinting that the market was hot, hot, hot.
However, what was so odd was that two of the three homes that the couple visited WERE EMPTY. They had no residents, no furniture — and they were older model homes because they showed you the warping siding which was in need of a little repair.
For a house to sit empty, two houses — it takes time — time that these houses should have already sold.
Don’t you think?
If a housing market is that HOT, you don’t see two empty homes without furniture or occupants. You don’t see vacant houses. Period.
Something smelled really fishy!
In the end, the show stated that the couple competed with seven other home purchasers, and finally got the house they wanted after paying $30,000 more than the asking price.
And that is not the strangest part: They bought one of the two houses that no one was living in. They bought an empty home where the owner had long ago moved out. The one that sat vacant for god knows how long…
Is this a new game in real estate, or is there something I am missing???? My alarm bells are ringing. If I were the purchaser, I’d have some some serious investigation work to do before I’d make an offer. This just isn’t logical.
Case Summary: Jennifer Hagel-Smith and her husband George were on their honeymoon cruising the Mediterranean when George came up missing after the honeymooners had a late night of partying with other cruise members.
Crews found a large blood spatter outside of the balcony of the Smith’s cabin. George Smith’s body was never recovered nor has the mystery been solved about what happened to George. Was it an accident or murder?
* * *
Jennifer Hagel Smith was on Oprah yesterday. Did you get a chance to see her speak?
Jennifer gave me the chills on several occasions. She unnerved me and made me uncomfortable. I do not trust what she is saying to be the truth. I have no doubt about it, Jennifer Hagel Smith, in my personal opinion is withholding information. If you ask me, I’d say she knows more than she is letting on.
What information? Of course, I do not know. I am not a psychic.
Here are parts of the interview and moments that give me big pause and concern:
Does Jennifer have a selective memory? I find her pause weird “last…you know…words…”. I do not believe this answer.
Does that answer make sense? Not to me. She isn’t grieving. She is feeling sorry for herself, if you want my opinion, not George.
Is that a logical answer? To me it’s not. She should show emotion, an out pouring of concern, affection. She should be questioning things, wanting answers, begging for answers. But she doesn’t. Perhaps she knows them??
“For example, I got home and then a week later I’m paying George’s bills now and I get a bill from Royal Caribbean, a week after the cruise ends. Like our room bill.”
She goes on…”Take care, take the time. We are people.”
“That has been the most hurtful part through all of this.”
The most hurtful part was getting the bill? What about George??? More than that, notice she is paying George’s bills. They aren’t hers. This is very odd. It shows separation in her mind, not a unity, a loving-memory of a unity. Most people when faced with a death cling to the unity, the specialness, the bond. You claim what you have left from the other person no matter how silly or trivial it is. Jennifer doesn’t. She divides herself from him — one week after he goes missing. For most people, even the discussion of being separated or having separate things, is too difficult.
Jennifer says, “That was it. Your life is over. That’s it.”
I ask “Whose life is over? Jennifer’s? How does blood in the room mean her life is over? Was she thinking only about herself again? A normal response would have been devastation, concern about foul play, murder, etc. Jennifer didn’t have that. This is a very peculiar answer.
Jennifer talks the most logical during her whole interview in the beginning of this paragraph above. In my opinion, she was telling the truth and her words flowed. Most of her interview with Oprah is full of stuttering, hesitations, word-searching except when Jennifer talked about the wrongs against her.
People word-search, stutter, hesitate when they make up a story. When they are truthful, the story flows quickly, logically and sensibly.
Huh? You only want more from yourself when you have more to give. Most wives would be saying they are doing all they can, could and will do to help figure this out — out of respect for their husband. Not Jennifer.
Hopefully, in time, the entire story will come out and we will find out what really happened to George. In my opinion, I believe Jennifer knows more than she is letting on.
* This post is an opinion of the author.
