Casey Anthony Tapes Released

/in /by

Several of you have inquired about my opinion of Casey Anthony and Cindy Anthony in the video tapes that were just released yesterday. Due to the volume of footage (several hours), I am not going to review all the segments. Personally, I don’t have the time. However, I am more than happy to respond to specific inquiries given specific content and time markers.

I did watch the first six minutes of this footage (Part 1 from July 25th), and I don’t see any indications in this footage that Cindy Anthony is in cahoots with her daughter, or that she has any indication where Caylee is at. She appears genuinely concerned, and stressed about her granddaughter’s whereabouts.

Read moreWhen I watch Cindy Anthony, she is very serious and her actions are indicative that she is on a mission to (a) comfort her daughter, but (b) to also try to find out facts. She is serious as one would expect, and intent on looking for Caylee. That is not unusual or notable in anyway. It is what I’d expect.

Casey on the other hand laughs and genuinely smiles at times as if nothing is wrong. It’s very notable. When one is deeply afraid and fears they have lost a loved one to a tragedy, they are usually not able to laugh or smile genuinely without any indications of fear or stress. Yet Casey laughs without any indications of stress or worry. Her voice also sounds free of distress which is also a red flag. All of this is indicative that Casey is not feeling normal emotions.

Notice Casey’s mom Cindy never breaks out in a deep smile or genuine laugher? That’s because Cindy is truly worried and concerned about Caylee, where Casey is not.

Feel free to post specific areas you would like me to look at below. Give me time marker spans of no more than 4 minutes, and please tell me precisely what you would like me to look at, and I will be happy to share with you what I see. Depending on the number of requests I get, I may not respond to all, but I will respond to the ones I feel are most valuable. Thanks!

Penny Boudreau Wiretap Evidence

/in /by

Penny Boudreau, arrested and charged with the murder of her daughter Karissa, appeared in court today. The Chronicle Herald in Canada is reporting the story. Boudreau asked for a trial by judge and jury.

What I found interesting in the article which I did not know before is that there is supposedly “wiretap evidence” in this case against Boudreau. I will be curious to see when that information is released what it reveals.

To read my opinion on Penny Boudreau before she was arrested or charged, click here.

Torn ACL in Dog

/in , /by

Last Spring, in March, my dog who was 15 at the time, fell on the ice and injured her leg. We gave it a few weeks to heal, but we saw rather quickly this injury wasn’t going to go away on its own so we scheduled an appointment with our vet. She clearly had a difficult time standing and walking. She could not put any weight on her injured leg. We were starting to carry her everywhere we went because just standing was agonizing for her.

Our vet looked over my dog and bent her knee, and told us that she has a rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament, otherwise known as the ACL. I guess it is not uncommon for puppies to have this happen to them as well as dogs of all ages. Its just something that happens to dogs.

___________________________________________________

One of the best things we did is get rid of my dog’s flat bed and got her a double-thick orthopedic bed (like this). We didn’t do this for 6 weeks, and when we did, the difference it made for her was unbelievable. I never would have guessed an orthopedic bed would have made that much difference, but it did. I strongly encourage you to get one for the healing process. It is well worth the money. Prior to this bed, her leg seemed to cramp and give out more, and the bed seemed to resolve a notable amount of her discomfort almost immediately. It didn’t eliminate the problem, but it made notable improvements.
____________________________________________________

Read moreI’ve had dogs all my life, but I’ve never seen this so I was taken aback. Essentially, the ligament that holds the knee from slipping out of joint and buckling the leg tears or ruptures. My dog’s ligament was ruptured so when she walked, her knee gave out on her–making it very awkward, uncomfortable, and very painful.

My vet who is exceptionally quick and accurate at diagnosing problems told us that if we ever wanted her to walk normal again, that she’d have to undergo knee surgery. There were no other options. He told us it wouldn’t heal on its own. I think he said it confidently, too, because he knew a new ligament would never re-grow. He told me that they would open up her knee, and put a new man-made ligament in between the bones to hold the knee in place. It was like a big, thick suture that would stay there permanently. He then told us she would walk in about 10 days.

Since my dog was 15, I was a little leery to put her under anesthesia, but the vet said she had a good chance of pulling through without any complications–though this was major surgery.

We scheduled her surgery, but I had strong reservations. I knew my vet was good, but I also knew he was quick with a knife and that he always took the most invasive steps first–which I don’t agree with. Naturally, though, aggressive steps equals more money, and this surgery was expensive. He quoted us between $1200 – $2000 for the knee repair depending on what he found when inside.

[Are you wondering why I didn’t read the vet better? Well, it’s real simple. When I go to the vet, I get emotional for a variety of reasons. When my emotions get involved, my lie-dar gets jammed and is useless to me, and at the vet I am not good at reigning in my emotions! I write about that more here.]

With that, I searched and searched online to find other people who were in my shoes hoping to find people who found alternative solutions, but I found nothing. Every website I found said that you should subject your dog to surgery or they would never walk again, or if they did it would be with a serious limp and arthritis would soon set in.

I also saw that while most dogs took their first steps in 10 days, they wouldn’t walk normally for 2 to 3 months. For the first 10 days, they needed help to get up and relieve themselves. They needed a nanny, so-to-speak. Worse, it took most dogs two to three months of healing time to return to normal. My vet forgot to tell me these details!! I was a little annoyed to say the least.

But I just wouldn’t give up. I know the body heals itself and doesn’t just crumble so I kept on looking. I finally found one website by a vet who I have read many times before. His name is Dr Mike Richards, DVM. He was the only vet online that I could find who spoke out, and gave a differing opinion. He said he has seen many patients have the surgery and many who did not because they could afford it, and to him, the outcomes were nearly identical.

That was all I needed: One guy to say it would be okay if we didn’t do the surgery. I canceled it 24 hours before it was scheduled. I was nervous, but I knew I could always change my mind.

It was a blessing for us, too, because the day before surgery, my dog stopped eating and when we took her to the vet we found out her liver was in serious trouble, and she would have likely died on the table had we proceeded. She became desperately ill (though she has thankfully pulled through!).

Two days after her scheduled surgery, I happened to talk to a neighbor about it all and he told me about his dog who I had known in the past who now lived with his ex-wife. He told me she had the exact same problem, and they never did surgery and she walked just fine. He told me his vet never even recommended the surgery. He assured me it would heal on its own.

I knew I made the right decision.

After that, I went home and kept reading, and low and behold I found several websites (one, two) by dog owners just like me who questioned this surgery. These are people who have let their dogs heal on their own naturally, too, and amazingly they heal just as fast as they do with surgical intervention!! These websites caution that not all dogs recover, but give them 2 months and see if there is improvement. If there is none, surgery may be the best option, but many dogs heal on their own, so why not try it?

What the body does is create scar tissue where the knee goes out of line and that scar tissue eventually gets big and strong enough to hold the knee in place. It makes the sense.

Max, whose dog Tigger ruptured ACLs in both legs at once, told us to limit my dogs activity until the pain subsided for her, and then to let her walk on her own, without straining on a leash. We did just that, and within a month, she had dramatically improved. After eight weeks, she was amazing. She was totally normal after three months.

She injured her leg in March and by June, you’d never would have known anything was wrong with her.

She is now 16, and if she turns wrong, she does throw out her leg, and it gets tender for a few days, but if we let it rest, she returns to normal within the week. She still believes she is a puppy so she pushes herself much more than most dogs her age. Mind you she jumps wildly, runs and plays and still thinks she is a youngen!

We are 100% satisfied that we never took such serious and invasive measures. They were totally unnecessary and we saved more than $2,000, but most importantly, I believe we saved her life!

So if you ever find yourself in this position–trust your instincts. Don’t let fear scare you into a decision. You always have time. You can always change your mind, and just because someone says there is only one solution, check it out for yourself. You might find a whole new world of information, if only you care enough to dig. Had I not done this, I would have lost the nine months with my doggie, and we’re still counting. Her liver is recovering, and she is as happy as ever. Every day I am thankful to spend it with her!

I do think this surgery is a huge money-maker for vets so be careful. My vet said my dog would never walk normal again, and was he wrong!

If you encounter this problem, feel free to contact me, or Max. Max seems to be very knowledgeable on the subject and keeps his website updated. Thanks, Max, for all your insight and support. You made a huge difference to my dog’s life!

‘Lie to Me’ Cast Talks about the Show

/in , /by

See more about the show here.

Renee Ohlemacher

/1 Comment/in , , /by

CBS 48 Hours profiled the case of Gary and Bernadette Ohlemacher this past Saturday. Renee Ohlemacher’s parents, Gary and Bernadette, were murdered in August of 2005. Police initially focused on Renee, but she was eventually cleared, and now the police are eyeballing the Ohlemacher’s mortgage broker, Ron Santiago. You can watch the full show online:


Watch CBS Videos Online

Read moreWhen I watch Renee speak, I am immediately struck by a variety of oddities in a very short period of time. It does not bode well for Renee.

  1. The first thing I notice right off the bat is that Renee is nervous, but that could be because it is the beginning of the interview, so I don’t put too much weight on that. Right after that, however, I find it odd how she refers to her mother as “…such a cool lady”. Her choice of words are distant and removed. If she said these words with other warm comments, I would discard the comment, but she doesn’t. This is the extent of her warm feelings. It makes a strong statement.

    Renee also said about her mom”She loved my dad.” Notice how she is removed from this equation? She doesn’t say anything personal or affectionate toward her mom, or how her mom was affectionate towards her. This is a glimpse how Renee really feels about her parents.

  2. Renee then says “My parents were probably the greatest parents ever.”

    This struck me immediately. An alarm bell blared in my head. The word “probably” here is what I coined a “hedge word”. When people say things that they don’t mean, yet try to sound convincing, it is not uncommon for them to slip up — perhaps even subconsciously–and add a hedge word.

    Are Renee’s parents kind of, sort of the best parents ever? She either believes it, or she doesn’t. It’s a half-baked statement, if you want my opinion.

  3. “So many things stay in my mind from that morning,” says Renee.

    Watch when she says this–watch her expression. She doesn’t shed a tear, or look sad as she supposedly thinks back to that horrible day. What does she do? She does what I would call a snicker. She starts to laugh, but then suppresses it. It’s not a microexpression or anything fleeting–it’s very obvious, and flat out haunting.

    Think about a horrible time in your life. Now tell the story and snicker, geuninely. Can you do it? If you really felt horrible, scared, violated, or a victim in a vulnerable situation, I can be confident the one thing you would not do is snicker or laugh. When we remember painful memories, we remember the painful emotions, too. Emotions actually drive many of our memories.

  4. Renee says “My mom was getting ready for work. I heard my mom scream. Dad yelled ‘What are you doing?'”

    Several things are interesting about this. First, it suggest that Renee was actually awake before the gunshots went off, and she was awake enough to be listening to her parents — to know her mom was getting ready for work.

    Isn’t that in contradiction to her saying that she woke-up to her mom’s screams? 48 Hours reports “Renee, 20 years old back in 2005, says she was sleeping when she was awakened by her mother’s screams.”

    If you get startled in your sleep from a scream, are you going realize miraculously that your mom was already up and getting ready for work? Why doesn’t she talk about being disoriented and frightened after waking up to haunting screams?

  5. Second, I find Greg Ohlemacher’s question “What are you doing?” odd. If the Ohlemacher’s were murdered by a stranger, would they respond like this? What if they knew the person but the person entered the house uninvited, do you think Greg Ohlemacher would respond with a simple “What are you doing?” If that person shot his wife, do you think he would say “What are you doing?”? What Renee is saying here doesn’t make sense to me.

    Also notice how Renee doesn’t recollect her dad saying “What are you doing?” in a panicked tone? You would think she would have felt his dire state in his voice and reflected those emotions in her recollection. It’s strangely missing.

  6. “Gunshots just went off,” says Renee. Notice the words “just”? Watch her expression again. When she says “gunshots”, there is a brief smile, or happy emotion that fleets across her face.

    How come she is getting these emotions? It appears like classic duper’s delight to me. It makes absolutely no sense no matter how you slice it unless you plug this into the equation. Renee’s emotions are very inconsistent with the message she is trying to give us. Her words are not matching her emotions at all. There are gaping contradictions.

  7. Renee says “It was just one thing after another happened and then, before you know it, there’s silence. My dog went silent. Everything went silent.”

    Just one thing after another? Is there more than Renee is sharing with us? What else did she hear? What were these “things”?

    I am also perplexed by the words ‘before you know it.” Usually people bearing witness to a horrific nightmare don’t say ‘before you know it’. Time usually stands still or moves painfully slow. Is Renee telling us time went really quickly for her during this nightmare? What does that tell us?

  8. Renee talks about what she was going to do now that she heard the gun shots. She says “Grab my cell phone, went to my closest.” She also doesn’t use pronouns which can be a hot spot to deception. Also notice how she says “grab” instead of “grabbed”? People usually remember things in past tense. They don’t talk in present tense (grab) and past tense (went) when recollecting a memory. They stay in past tense consistently.

    People who are deceptive, however, who didn’t actually do what they say often confuse the two. This is notable and unusual.

    This is 8 notable points in 1:34 seconds into the show

  9. I find Renee’s word choices on the 911 call interesting too. First she says totally emotionless, “I just dialed 911.” “Please God…cannot be happening.”

    She ‘just” called 911? Notice, too, the lack of pronoun usage again? It’s another red flag to add to the pile.

  10. The fact that Renee did not call 911 immediately is also a red flag for me. If you think there is an intruder, a robber, a burglar, or a stranger in your house killing your parents, wouldn’t you fear for your own life? How come Renee did not have fear the killer or killers might come get her?
  11. If you thought someone was in the house to kill your family, would you really risk pushing seven digits instead of three digits to get help — if you feared for your safety? Dialing any phone in a silent house can be loud and noticable. It could easily lure a killer or killers into your room or a closet–especially if they are looking for you. How come Renee was so sure the killer or killers were gone and not looking for her or downstairs robbing the house?
  12. Notice she didn’t whisper on the 911 call, or keep her voice super low out of fear? Why not? Renee appears to have felt totally secure to sit in her closet and dial other people and talk without a whisper — even when she did finally call 911. It speaks volumes.
  13. Why did Renee call her mom’s co-worker before she called 911? Were they in cohoots or something? It definitely raises my eyebrows. Renee’s mom had talked to Mike Allen 23 times in the month leading up to her death, as well as the night before. Why was Renee calling him? Mike Allen according to 48 Hours also showed up at the crime scene “very quickly”. It’s interesting to say the least.
  14. Renee continues “My dad was just lying on the floor. My mom was in her bath towel.”

    Is Renee recollecting this as a memory? Her behavior seems to support this. It’s part of her story of that morning yet a few minutes later she tells us the police escorted her out of the house, she asked if her parents were okay, and then she found out about her parents being deceased. See #18. Does that make any sense? Did Renee see them dead before she was told they were dead? Has she admitted to this?

    Notice here that she acts like she is crying, but there are no tears?

  15. “I felt like that morning was the end of my life.” Notice the smirk again?

    That’s all in the first 1:58 seconds into 48 Hours.

  16. The fact that Renee’s entire family stands as one in suspicion of Renee I think also speaks volumes. Their recollection her behavior is indeed perplexing. For Renee to be waving hi to friends and to be texting during the service clearly shows a woman without boundaries. And for her to be out BMW shopping shows she wasn’t too upset about her mother’s death, or worried about coping without them.
  17. Erin Moriarty asks, “Why not 911?” and Renee says, “Yeah…ah…because I thought that you could get through faster or something, for some reason. I didn’t know what to do. I was in a world of shock.”

    Does this make any sense? It’s total nonsense.

    Clearly, by Renee’s behavior here, we can see this question took her by surprise. She didn’t seem prepared to answer Moriarty’s question which is a red flag. She seems to be thinking as she speaks. When people are honest, they don’t have to be prepared. They don’t have to think. They just speak from the heart.

  18. Erin Moriarty asks “When did you realize your parents were dead?” Renee says “Well they escorted me out of the house and they went upstairs. I asked one of the cops, are they okay? Are they fine?”

    Did they escort her out of the closet? If so, this brings up two points. Why does Renee have this memory of her parents gunned down in number 14 above if she was escorted out of the closet by the cops? If she saw a picture later or went into the house later, why isn’t that part of her memory and story she is telling us? Why isn’t it in chronological order? People when they recollect things usually tell them in logical order.

    Second, this is proof that Renee had total disregard for her parents life. If she didn’t know they were dead or injured at this point, how could she not summons help on the spot and express urgency on the 911 call? Hearing gunshots doesn’t mean her parents had died yet – even if they were hit with bullets. It’s like she gave up–which normal people don’t do. Normal people hang on to every shred of hope — even against all odds that maybe, if they get help, the people will survive–regardless of what happened. But Renee seems to have held no hope.

    Had Renee told us she found her parents dead bodies, and needed time to cope, perhaps it would make more sense, but I don’t believe this is the story. Correct me if I am wrong.

  19. I also find it inconsistent how Renee says that she was shocked about Ron Santiago being named a suspect. 48 Hours writes “It does sound a little far fetched, even to Renee. ” She made some comments supporting disbelief as well.

    Yet at the end of the show she changes her tune and says “”What bugs me is that he’s still living a normal life. He’s got a family. I don’t get to have laughs with my mom, I don’t have a home. I don’t have somebody to go back to.” Why does Renee now believe he is guilty? What suddenly changed her mind? It’s rather inconsistent and perplexing.

    Also notice when she says the last sentence she acts like she is crying again, but there are no tears.

I’m going to stop here. Do I think Renee killed her parents? I cannot say. Could she have let someone else in the house that morning, perhaps telling her parents that she was going to do something with someone else, and that person pulled the trigger? It’s entirely plausible, but if you want my opinion, Renee knows a lot more than she is telling us. I don’t trust a word out her mouth.