Tonight on FOX is the Kelly Files. Megyn Kelly is having a retired CIA agent on who believes the parents of baby Lisa Irwin. Baby Lisa disappeared in October of 2011.
I have shared my opinion on the parents from day one, and I didn’t believe them. There are ample clues in nearly every interview they have done that does not support honesty.
In the video preview of the show tonight (above) of Deborah, the mom, we can clearly see her “thinking on her feet” as she answers the question posed by Phil Houston, and say she was “possiblynot alert”. Either she was alert or she wasn’t! Why does she have to think to answer the questions and then not even give us a concrete answer? It makes no sense if she is being honest with us.
In reviewing video after video of the parents of baby Lisa, I can continually point out hotspot after hotspot after hotspot.
If anyone watches the show tonight and finds a clip of it and would like my thoughts, feel free to leave a comment.
https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg00Eyes for Lieshttps://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpgEyes for Lies2015-01-02 14:44:232015-01-02 14:46:59The Kelly Files Tonight
It’s been almost eight months after little baby Lisa disappeared. Her parents are back in the news. The last public appearance they made was in February on the Dr. Phil show, and they haven’t spoken again until today.
They talk of wanting police to investigate a fraudulent charge on Jeremy’s credit card that was made on a UK website one month after baby Lisa disappeared, where they allege someone purchased a service where one could change the name of a baby.
In this interview, what I find is strangely missing is any pleas on their behavior for people to look for their daughter! If they believe she is alive, why aren’t they asking people to look for her? Why aren’t they identifying her unique features and asking people to keep an eye out for her? Most parents would be begging.
I have always found the parents of baby Lisa’s behavior very suspicious from day one. You can read my original thoughts here.
https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg00Eyes for Lieshttps://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpgEyes for Lies2012-05-21 12:54:002012-05-21 12:54:00Baby Lisa’s Parents: Investigate Fraudulent Charge
Many people have mentioned that Deborah Bradley appears to have gotten a makeover. You can see she is “beautified” in this video. I can’t help but wonder if this was a strategy by her defense attorneys, or if Deborah did this on her own. She doesn’t hit me as the glamor type to care about dying her hair or wearing makeup unless she is going somewhere special or has a date. She didn’t for the first several weeks and all of the sudden a high profile attorney moves in and things change. I can’t help but wonder if someone in her legal team (who I won’t name) has sized up the situation, is looking at this case for big publicity, and has decided to do as much damage control long before the case develops to increase their odds of winning–knowing this has all the hallmarks of a high media coverage case. The thought truly troubles me…
https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg00Eyes for Lieshttps://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpgEyes for Lies2011-10-25 14:10:002011-10-25 14:10:00Deborah Bradley Makeover?
Deborah Bradley now admits that she didn’t put Lisa Irwin to bed at 10:30 like she said, but rather 6:40 PM. And she also admits that she was drunk that night. When we look back at Deborah’s behavior, she clearly has no problem changing facts to suit her. I can’t help but wonder at this point if she is a pathological liar.
Today Jeremy nows adds that Deborah sleeps with the fan on high. Has this ever been mentioned before?
As many of you noted, it makes absolutely no sense that Deborah and Jeremy would be protecting the two boys from the police at Lisa’s expense, if they had nothing else to hide.
Deborah talks about how the boys heard noises that night, but says she hasn’t inquired with them further to find out specifics. A mom who truly doesn’t know what happened to her daughter would have long ago talked to those children and would understand what they heard, and would share that openly with law enforcement. the fact that they are not says they have more to hide.
Clearly, Jeremy and Lisa still know more than they are telling us, without question… It isn’t looking good for baby Lisa, sadly.
Click here to read my original opinion when the parents first spoke out.
https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg00Eyes for Lieshttps://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpgEyes for Lies2011-10-17 15:35:002011-10-17 15:35:00Deborah Bradley: “I was drunk”
Many of you have likely seen the story of missing baby Lisa Irwin from Missouri. She is 10-months old. The story being told to the press is that her father, Jeremy, discovered her missing from her bed at 4:00 a.m. this past Tuesday in the early morning after he came home from his work shift. He woke up his wife and they called police. At some point, they discovered an open window that was tampered with.
The couple claims that whoever abducted their daughter also stole three cell phones from the house from the kitchen counter. I find this perplexing. If the father goes to work, doesn’t he carry his cell phone with him? Or does he leave it home? I would be curious why he wouldn’t have it with him at work. Is there a logical reason for it?
In watching this video, the mother, Deborah, is displaying true sadness, which can support the truth or deception–so it has no other meaning than to tell us she is truly sad. The father, however, shows no sadness, no oblique eyebrows–no emotions whatsoever. He is stoic. It’s notable.
In the very beginning of the interview Jeremy says, “…obviously all very unusual and I started checking on the kids. Checked on the boys first, and then we checked on her and that’s when we realized she was gone.”
If you notice Jeremy goes from “I” to “we”. His word usage is suggesting that when he was with his wife that is when “they” discovered Lisa was gone, but I thought he discovered it first. Which is it?
I am also flagged by Deborah when she says about the missing cell phones, “They were on the counter in the kitchen and there’s ah…whenever I was….we woke up…and I woke up and he came home and I was..he said she is not in her crib and I said what do you mean she’s not in her crib? And I just knew, you know….something was really wrong and we run around the house and we were screaming for her and she nowhere and then I said call 911, call 911 and he said where are the phones? And they weren’t on the counter where I left them. They were gone.”
Why is Deborah having trouble talking and keeping her story straight about waking up? Why does she have all these false starts and self-censoring?
Both of them seem to be having trouble sticking to their story that he came home and found Lisa missing and he, Jeremy, woke Deborah up. Why is that if they are telling us the truth?
https://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpg00Eyes for Lieshttps://www.eyesforlies.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/black-logo-smaller.jpgEyes for Lies2011-10-06 12:38:002015-01-02 14:36:38Lisa Irwin Missing: Hotspots